Welcome to the FVC website!

We are raising awareness and understanding of why Vallecitos Water District rates are high, and what can be done about it.


An FVC co-founder presented to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and was asked to submit a brief on his advocacy efforts for publication. Please read and don’t keep it to yourself – be an advocate. Thank you

The roles of elected officials include setting the general direction of the agency and making policies consistent with the vision and mission of the agency.  Executive management is responsible to implement policies and make the elected officials and the public aware of the impacts of policies considered.  When policies are not in the public’s interest, and executive management fails to disclose the true impact of adopted policies, consumer advocates take on the role of ensuring that the public’s interest is at the fore-front of decision making.

***Action Alert***

Vote! Don’t skip past Vallecitos Water District on the ballot. You will only see Division 5 on the Ballot and only if you live East of Rancho Santa Fe, South of 78, and West of Twin Oaks.  If you are not in that division, that does not mean this election will not impact your rates, quality of service, developer influence. Each Board Member has an equal vote. There were no developer subsidies paid by ratepayers until Hal Martin, the incumbent was elected in 2012. Please view the division maps on the Vallecitos website http://www.vwd.org/departments/board-of-directors, reach out to friends and acquaintances in Division 5, and encourage them to vote. Only a handful of thousands of voters know. The rest will be influenced by outreach paid for by developers. Thank you!

The Development Subsidy Paid for by Ratepayers

As of June 30, 2020, the developer fund deficit is now $15.5 million (up from $14.6 million this time last year).  This deficit represents money paid by Vallecitos customers (ratepayers) to fund urban development – a subsidy.  Developer fees are not sufficient to pay for their impacts and Vallecitos has no plans to adjust developer fees for at least five years. Vallecitos projects the subsidy paid out of our water and sewer rates will increase to $21.2 million within one year.  Vallecitos is the only water or sewer agency in San Diego County, likely all of California, with a developer fund deficit – the only agency that subsidizes urban development with ratepayer money.

Ratepayer Reserve Surplus

As of June 30, 2020, ratepayer reserves are now at $97.8 million, compared to $23.2 million when developer-backed politicians gained control of the Board in 2013 – that’s money above and beyond what is necessary to pay for operating costs and asset replacements.  It is prudent to maintain some level of reserves, but no other water or sewer agency in San Diego County has accumulated more ratepayer money in reserve than Vallecitos.  Fifteen percent of our current water and sewer bill goes to increase reserves even further.  Vallecitos projects water and sewer rate increases of 3.5% to 4% next year “and beyond.”

Attend VWD Board Meetings

Vallecitos Water District Board of Directors meets every first and third Wednesday of each month at 5 pm. Attend and provide public comment expressing your concern about the breaks given to developers at the expense of ratepayers. For agendas and more information.

Get the confidence you need to address the Vallecitos Board of Directors. Get educated. View FVC’s GET EDUCATED and RATEPAYER EQUITY COALITION pages.

BIA and Developer Payments to Martin and Sannella

Vallecitos Water District (VWD) Board Members Mike Sannella and Hal Martin receive campaign contributions from the Building Industry Association (BIA) and developers. Even though the two-member standing committees of VWD must, by policy, rotate members every year, Sannella and Martin have remained the only members of VWD’s Finance Committee since 2014. Since then VWD ratepayers have paid $52.3 million to amass reserves, fund the developer deficit, and pay for future developer obligations. Also, since then, not one action item has come before the Board regarding long-range financial planning. Learn more at https://friendshipvallecitoswater.org/get-educated/#developer-contributions

Vallecitos’ balance is from their most recent Reserve Report in the Board Packet online. Agencies contiguous to Vallecitos’ service area balances are from their most recent audited financial statements online.

The Political Shift that Cost Water Customers Millions

In 2013, newly elected officials of the Vallecitos Water District broadened their scope to include growing the economy.

“The District’s interest has to do with providing basic services, sewer and water, at the best price. That’s all it is. It has nothing to do with helping out developers.” Jim Poltl, Former Member of the Board of Directors

In response, “I look at the bigger picture – economic stimulus. Smaller governmental agencies … make that happen.” Hal Martin, Member of the Board of Directors

Would the economy have grown without the breaks given to developers? Did we pay more for water to stimulate the economy? Or did we just bolster developer profit margins?

Recent Presentations

Check out these recent presentations to learn more: San Marcos Water Rates and Politics, San Marcos Democratic Club, June 13, 2020; Attorney General Consumer Complaint, May 22, 2020; California Water Politics and Pricing, AICPA Government Performance and Accountability Committee, May 5, 2020; San Diego County Taxpayers Association Golden Fleece Nomination, February 12, 2020; San Marcos Water Rates and Politics, Republican Women of California, February 3, 2020; and San Marcos Water and Politics-The Price We Paid, Palomar College Political Economy Days, October 23, 2019, recorded lecture, presentation slides, and news article.

Vallecitos’ balance is from their most recent Reserve Report in the Board Packet online. Agencies contiguous to Vallecitos’ service area balances are from their most recent audited financial statements online.

Developer funds (developer fees paid less expenditures to offset impacts from development) plummeted to record deficits when development in San Marcos soared! Why? Visit RATEPAYER EQUITY COALITION

How was the developer deficit funded? Visit RATEPAYER EQUITY COALITION